Where the line sits

You own the roadmap, the priorities and the trade-offs. We own the engineering: architecture, implementation, review, testing and release. You decide what gets built. We decide how, and tell you what it costs before you commit to it.

What you get

A senior team on a fixed two-week cadence, with a named engineer accountable for every change
Your backlog, reordered by you between cycles at no cost
Estimates that arrive with acceptance criteria attached, so "finished" is settled before the work starts
A demo of working software at the end of every cycle, and a straight answer on anything at risk within one business day of us knowing
Architecture decisions written down, so your own team and your next supplier can both follow them

When to choose this

Choose this when you have a product owner or project manager who is good and busy, and what you are actually short of is engineers. It is the most common shape for scale-ups, and for enterprise teams running a project the internal queue cannot absorb.

When not to

This shape needs a product decision from you inside every two-week cycle. Without one it stalls, and you pay for the waiting. Take end-to-end delivery.

What we commit to

Anything outside the acceptance criteria is a change request, priced in writing before it starts. Anything that fails them is a bug and it is on us. Miss a cycle we committed to, and that cycle is not billed.

How it is bought

Usually as two-week cycles, because the direction moves and that is the point of the shape. It converts to a fixed Statement of Work once the scope stops moving and you want a date and a number to hold us to.

After acceptance, ongoing work runs on a monthly retainer if you want us to stay. You are not obliged to take one.